Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Best browser
GeekNewz Community > Computers > Support & Discussion > Software
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
anakinsolois
Yeah and if you want a good UI get the Noia 2.7 theme for Firefox
TrickFinlay2
thanks for the advice anakin it looks like a great theme,im d/l for anyone that wants the link here it is http://www.deviantart.com/view/4266778/
GTX5_Crusader
Check my signurature. Guess what I use. tongue.gif

What could possibly be better? biggrin.gif
Rezza
damn right.
anakinsolois
Weirdos. At least give FirFox a try. Youll feel at home because it imports all your IE favs and even the cookies
Rezza
notice how all the geeks who get places always use IE. Me, GTX, M$ and I'm sure actz uses IE too.

"A little geekiness driveth one away from IE, enough geekiness bringeth one back" (Inside joke for all you budding philosophers out there tongue.gif)
anakinsolois
Yeah but THE geek, like the most important one of all, you know like the best (for those of you who havent caught on its me) uses Firefox.

THE geek (anakinsolois) > actz, rezza, M$ Agent, GTX etc. etc.
mutinymonger
Avant and Firefox. Alright, I will give them a shot this weekend. Hopefully they uninstall decently, I hate hacking registry for poor uninstallation progs. Thank-you for your input.
anakinsolois
Firefox uninstalls pretty well. The prefs folder will be under C:\Documents and Settings\[User Name]\Application Data\Mozilla\

This is necessary since firefox cant be upgraded, only uninstalled and reinstalled. So a lot of people prefer it when theri prefs are preserved. Hoepfully you wont need to uninstall it biggrin.gif
veeline
i have heard of a X-Webs Mega Browser which claims 2 b 6 times faster than IE...
i have never used it though...
ujjwald
No browser can be six times as fast as any other. It mainly depends on the connection speed. I use IE currently, as its too much of a bother dloading flash plugins and toolbars for firefox. But on my linux system I have got a fully loaded firefox.
anakinsolois
yeah the X-Webs browser is supposedly 6x faster and was verified by BBC. However its creator Adnan Osami, an Irish student chose to release it commercially eventually. I think there was something about him selling it to someone this january
gofikphoenix
QUOTE
notice how all the geeks who get places always use IE. Me, GTX, M$ and I'm sure actz uses IE too


Actually i believe that Actz uses Firefox.
ujjwald
Was it the one that compresses images before dloading them?
mutinymonger
I believe that certain browsers are quicker than others. When I saw Netcaptor for the first time, it was open, loaded a site w/o cookies or anything, so first time visit. I watched another site being open with the same amount of graphics and text, usine IE, and netcaptor was quicker. About being 6x as quick as IE... unlikely, but then again, so were PC's in the 60's...
Rezza
No, this is a next generation browser, it's not just any other browser, it's 6x as fast as all the browsers, including IE (since they generally have the same speed)
GTX5_Crusader
What could be better than Internet Explorer? Simple. Fast. Easy to use; No need to learn new buttons or commands. Simple to use content control. Low memory and processor usage. And no secondary programs to install or upgrade or patch or re-install or fix or... you get the idea. Internet Explorer: Fast. Simple. Made for the future.

Sorry... my advertising attitude got in there...
yaggy
Looking at the poll results, its good to see people are finally getting away from the MS crap known as IE and are moving toward something much better, Firefox.

I'm sure there are some IE diehards, the ones afraid of changes for the better that will still, foolheartedly defend the crap known as IE

DO NOT BE AFRAID OF THE LIGHT , go towards the light !!!!!!!

Firefox 46.34%
IE 19.51%

FF is still in beta, LOL and is far superior in all ways to IE.

Firefox 1.0 is just around the corner folks, time to get on the bandwagon or be left behind with your antiquated IE.
GTX5_Crusader
Don't forget I can edit your posts and make you an IE lover. tongue.gif

But I can't abuse my powers... much...

What's so bad about IE? No "fancy" options and bright colors? Wow... colors give away anything, don't they?

BTW: If I were so afraid of change I would still be using Windows 3.1. Ah hell.. I'd be using DOS...
yaggy
Do you honestly think that the problem with IE is the lack of Options and colours ??
Please tell us you were being sarcastic and that you do know the downside of using IE and that you do know how Firefox is Faster, More secure, and a lot more feature rich, not to mention the support FF has from the "geek" comunity while IE is shunned at !!!!
Please tell us, as a Mod of supposed "geek" community that you dont really use IE since we all know the true geeks of the world would use FF knowing how crap IE is.

The poll itself should indicate to you how people feel in regards to choice of browser, its telling us that almost 48% of us prefer FF ? There must be a reason for this, dontcha think ?

BTW you can change posts to your hearts content smile.gif but i'm affraid that would not change my feeling toward IE nor would it change the almost 48% of us that know Firefox is vastly superior to IE, in all aspects.

I just cant understand how anyone can support IE and claim it to be better than Firefox, that is simply mind boggling.

PS. There still time for you to join the ranks of true geekdom and hop aboard the FF train, you dont want to left in the cold with something as old and decrepid as IE.
Hell, you may as well be using 3.1 if your gonna stick with IE. tongue.gif

Like i said, dont be afraid... Change is good.
Rezza
I also support IE. The "geeks" on the internet are not a cattle I follow. Respectable computer professionals always prefer the simple, clean IE to the overbloated Firefox and opera that have features to work the toaster on them.

And don't force you're opinion on others like religious dogma, I use what feels right, and I won't change until I feel more comfortable using FF than IE, and isn't that what it's all about? Comfort!
anakinsolois
overbloated firefox? lmao, IE is overbloated. Anyways, if youve tried it and dont like it theres nothing i can do to change your mind
yaggy
LOL @ Rezza

Overbloated Firefox ? Come on now ! I'm sure even you know this to be untrue.

Comparing FF and IE, FF is by far the more Simple, Clean, less bloated browser.

Perhaps the "geeks" of the world know something that the "Respectable computer professionals" do not.
GTX5_Crusader
I think Firefox is just for people who do not wish to download a few programs that not only make Internet Explorer better but also their computer safer.

Firefox "emulates" speed. When the site says "it's FASTER!", really now... Why is it faster? They say pages load faster... That's impossible to do with just the use of an internet browser. To be able to make the internet faster you have to either upgrade your connection OR use compression through your ISP's proxy server. A browser cannot download pages faster by itself or even with your computer's help. It has to be done though the ISP... which sometimes costs more money.

Yeah yeah yeah... I've heard about the security flaws of IE with ActiveX and such... How hard is it, really, to go into the IE's options an DISABLE ACTIVE X?!.... Wow... that was hard...

Wow... I can get defensive sometimes... lol

Oh... and computer professionals?! I am a Microsoft Certified Professional (MCP). I may not be no big-wig MCSE, but I am still in collage for Computer Forensics/Network Security.
yaggy
Internet Explorer, due to its thousands of web-page rendering bugs, has to spend extra time loading web pages. It goes to unnecessary lengths to handle errors, even when a DOCTYPE has been specified in the source sometimes.
As a result of this, IE loads web pages more slowly than necessary. And even when the page is loaded, IE renders it incorrectly.

One of the great things about the the Internet are web standards. Web standards are controlled by a non-profit agency (the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)), and therefore do not favour any one company's intentions.
However, rather than actually support these essential web standards, Internet Explorer and Microsoft have effectively created their own (albeit through lazy programming, and countless numbers of bugs), and Internet Explorer as a result displays valid web pages incorrectly.

Imagine how frustrated web developers must be when they create a beautiful design, complying to all official standards, which falls apart in Inernet Explorer. Tested in Mozilla and Opera, it works fine. They must spend extra time (and charge the client more) to make it work in Internet Explorer.
This client/company must pass on these costs to their customers, which means you are paying more than you need to because of Internet Explorer. Also, the loading time of the page increases because of extra coding.

Because Internet Explorer doesn't support CSS properly (faster download, because a page's design must only be loaded once, then just content), programmers and web designers must use 'hacks', or old or invalid code (takes longer to load). This means IE is slowing the entire Internet down significantly!
Web developers must go to extra lengths to make PNG alpha transparency, drop-down menus, and many other nice features work in Internet Explorer.

Internet Explorer is used by most people simply because it is on their computer when they buy it. Perhaps the most obvious disadvantages for the user are the bad features in IE.

While other browsers such as Mozilla Firefox and Opera have made great recent innovations, like tabbed-browsing, integrated search, one-click downloading, and various downloadable extensions, Internet Explorer has basically remained the same in terms of features. And if you want a certain feature in Mozilla Firefox, you can mention your idea on Mozilla's forums, and chances are someone will make it for you. Because it it is open source software, anyone can add things to it.
If you want to open two pages at once in IE, you have to open a new window. This is OK for two windows, but when you have several open, it can get very annoying. Mozilla, Opera and Safari have tabbed browsing

Internet Explorer is a very vulnerable browser. It allows many trojan-horses, worms, spyware and adware and other viruses through without the user doing anything wrong or knowing that anything has gone wrong. Recently, millions of IE users had computers which switched off for no reason at all times. This was the Sasser worm, which took advantage of a known flaw in IE. Since then, the US Government's Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT), produced an article which told users to stop using Microsoft Internet Explorer.
This is just some of the controversy surrounding Microsoft and IE regarding security. Many Internet Explorer users are now setting security settings to ridiculous levels, which slows down and stops certain sites from displaying. None of this is necessary. All that is necessary is to switch to a different browser.

All of the above information is C&P from...

http://www.stopie.com/
GTX5_Crusader
A site created by people with a biased opinion twords IE. Genuine.

Ok, I'm talking from a person with a Windows Operating System's point of view. So, if I say something like "IE comes standard"... I mean for Windows tongue.gif

Let's start off:
QUOTE

Internet Explorer's Main Problems
Although there are countless bugs in Internet Explorer, here are the main reasons to choose a free alternative.

Prone to viruses and worms
Renders pages incorrectly. Web designers then need to spend extra time working so that pages work in Internet Explorer. This puts costs up, and slows the web down.
Doesn't let people resize certain text sizes. This means those with poor sight cannot read small text on many sites.
Far slower program than other web browsers
Far larger program than other web browsers
Isn't as user-centric as other web browsers. It lacks many handy features suched as tabbed browsing and integrated search
Doesn't support PNG images properly


Prone to viruses and worms
-I've used IE since it was invented... well... to an extent. Anyway, I have been to sites that not only allow downloading of viruses and trojans, most of those sites will TRY to install things in the background that will attempt to infect your computer. I used IE while going to these sites. No problems. Oh, and the issue about the large security flaw of IE that Microsoft fixed? FIREFOX HAS PROBLEMS TO!!! And both IE and FF were fixed.
-Also, how many bugs and virus attacks did IE get when it was first release or in it's early versions? It's been out for quite some time, so people have had LOTS of time to hack it. Mozilla is what... version 1.7 now? And Firefox 0.9? Give it time. They'll get hacked as well. Mozilla isn't god.

Renders pages incorrectly. Web designers then need to spend extra time working so that pages work in Internet Explorer. This puts costs up, and slows the web down.
-You know... if people stop using IE 3.0 they wouldn't have that problem. I will admit that IE 4.0 and earlier did have problems with newer standards. It's like trying to install Unreal Tournament 2004 on Windows 3.1.

Far slower program than other web browsers
-Yeah. Give me a break. You install the OS. BOOM. You have IE. You click the icon and BOOM it's there. You load a page... IT'S THERE. People complain that browsers like Firefox have "everything you need" and you don't have to install pop-up blockers and ActiveX blah blah blah... Well, you DO have to install Firefox... right? IE comes with all Window's OSs. And yet people complain when they have to install 1 more program to help IE out just a little bit?
-None of that "It'll load pages slower"... Well, that's your internet connection and your computer speed.

Far larger program than other web browsers
-Does the words "Outlook Express included" mean ANYTHING?

Doesn't let people resize certain text sizes. This means those with poor sight cannot read small text on many sites.
-Show me a site that does that and I'll show you an argument.

Isn't as user-centric as other web browsers. It lacks many handy features suched as tabbed browsing and integrated search
-Two things: The TASKBAR and the SEARCH BUTTON mean nothing? TASKBAR and SEARCH BUTTON!

Doesn't support PNG images properly
-This one goes along with the incorrent rendering one. Get something newer than IE 4.0 and you might get somewhere. Browse around Here at a PNG image place. I did. No problems whatsoever.

Ok, the only reason it took so long for me to reply was I was doing research to back up my claims. Some things I can't show (Like the resizing of text) because there aren't sites that are specific on that subject. Just incase you want to argue it, I'm useing Internet Explorer 6.0.3790.0 SP1. Yeah, I didn't even have to go download it. It was just there. Oh, and I can get the "MSN Toolbar" which has the "Intergrated Search Bar" and "Pop-Up blocker". Wow. 1 Download. The same as if you went and got Firefox.

On my last note (for now)... If Internet Explorer is such a problem for programmers and web page designers to set their pages to be "better" on IE... why do they still do it? Why not just stop? That would force people to use something other than IE... right?
yaggy
You have your opinions on IE (albit flawed) and others have theres on FF.

You sound like someone that getting paid by MS, spewing crap all over the place.

No one is forcing you to change browsers but please stop isulting us with your drivel.

Perhaps there are some "experienced" computer users that can "fix" IE to be less of a security threat but try telling that the 100000's of people that have had there systems shitfaced due directly to the problems and security flaws with IE. THS IS THE IMPORTANT PART, IE IS FULLY RESONSIBLE FOR WRECKING 100000's OF SYSTEMS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Every person i talk to that has had a problem with their system i tell them to quit using IE/OE and switch to FF/TB and every one of them could not be happier.

ROFL, oooooooo IE comes bundled with windows, thats why i use it. Big friggin deal, thats prolly why it has so much problems. That has to be the most "noob" thing i have seen here, I'm beggining to doubt you actually know how to operate a computer !!!!!!! and that would be sad considering you are a "mod" of a "geek" related forum, I hope i am wrong on my assumption !

Gezzzzz, one might have to DL an program thats <5 MB whoopdefuggindo

Bottom line here, like it or not..... Enjoy your (wahhhhh, i dont want to swich and i love Bill Gates) crap ass , bloatware, POS, computer wrecking, sloooowwww (YES it has been proven slower no matter what you claim) junk IE while the more advanced and itelligent of us continue using FF.


Sometime around 9/14 look for the milestone 1.0 release of Firefox and Thunderbird.

Its sad really that a "beta" product is far more advanced, secure, polished that something that has been around for years.

There was a time that i backed IE till i actually gave Mozilla a whirl (you know, actually tried if for a while till i got used to it !!! ) From that day on , i have never looked back, never touched IE/OE and couldnt be more pleased with the performance of both FF and TB

Have you actually used Firefox ? or would installing and using a new browser be beyond you scope of comprehension ?
I can walk you through the process if you want.

Please disregard spelling errors as its getting late here and i'm half asslep but i feel this is to important (getting people to swich from IE)
GTX5_Crusader
My intellectual abilities are none of your concern, and attempting to personally insulting me has failed. Challenging such has placed you in a position that just shows your argument is limited if you have to resort to insulting me. But... I won't fight back with insults. I'll fight back against Firefox and not a member of a forum.

Yes. I have tried Firefox. And I will say that it's a rather nice browser. But many of the features of it are already in Internet explorer.

QUOTE
Gezzzzz, one might have to DL an program thats <5 MB whoopdefuggindo


So... why do people complain when they have to download the MSN toolbar for IE?

I have tried Firefox. I have tried Opera. I tried them for more than an hour. I tried them for several days. I went to sites that would really cause problems with computers. I have yet to find something that they can do that IE doesn't (Besides the different layouts)...

QUOTE
I'm beggining to doubt you actually know how to operate a computer !!!!!!!

Ok... so I said I was an MCP... I don't need paper to prove anything though.

yaggy
LOL i could say that i'm The President of The USA on a message board but that doesn't mean i know how to run a country !!!!!!!!

"I have yet to find something that they can do that IE doesn't"

Ummmm Work? Not unknowingly install malicious content? Not Crash? Open text links ? Undo closed tabs ? Kill object ? Extensions ? ETC ETC

And dont spew about "tweaking" IE to avoid the security problems, the average joe will not do this and will be in trouble with his default instal of IE while the FF user is free and clear.

Oh and BTW Tabbed Browsing is much much better than Taskbar browsing and takes a lot less resourses. Open 30 pages in tabs, no problem.... try that with IE, good luck.

Quite franky, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to recognize a superior product !!!!!!!! The sooner more people realize the benefits of FF over IE the sooner we can rid the world of the virus know as Internet Explorer
anakinsolois
OK you two, cut it out with the long posts, im getting a headache.

yaggy, stop insulting people just because they dont like programs that you do.

gtx, you probably dont feel any speed boost since you have a 1 MBps lin or was it 2? But to people who get 6KBps, firefox makes a whole world of difference. Security wise I'd say that while IE is more secure than firefox its more prone to viruses/spyware etc. etc. since 94% of people use IE.

But the part about MS not following standards is true to a certain extent. All browsers should follow the W3C standards, and then pages would render properly on all of them
GTX5_Crusader
I run a 3MB line. But that's not the issue. I've only had this connection for about 6 months. I lived on a 28.8Kbps (3KBps) modem internet connection for about 5 years. And I do know that a speed like that is pathetic... I'm used to it. I'm just saying it's impossible for a browser to compress images BEFORE they reach your computer unless by some agreement from the ISP.

Your computer sends a request to your ISP for a web page. Your ISP goes and get's it. Then, the ISP retrieves it, then sends it to you. If your ISP sends the files to you, then your computer gets them, how can the browser compress them or download them faster? The ISP's proxy server has to do that.

Anyway... yaggy... do you use Windows? If you do, if you use anything less than Windows 2003, I don't want to hear anything about security. If not (if you use Linux or something), nevermind then. That's another story.

And true. Firefox has all the popup blocking and the ActiveX and whatnot ready to go for the average Joe to be able to plug and go. I'm just saying with a little work in the option panel of IE you can bascially do the same thing (except the pop-up blocking... I'll give a point to Firefox on that one...)

I think I'm done for now. I'm not out of arguments, I just don't see any reason to continue. I feel we've both made very valid points. Let the users decide. And so what if 99.342452529% of the world uses something other than IE? I know I probably will be...
yaggy
Ummm better check you post ,

You said IE is more secure than Firefox ? LOL
You also said 94% use Firefox ? again LOL

Aye, it must be late.


OH, I have NOT isulted anyone, i mearly stated my opinion which i stand by ! Truth hurts i guess.




ianm
as yaggy tried to explain, IE quite simply does not support a few things that most other browsers do. We arent talking about IE4 here, we're talking latest version, fully patched and so forth.

as he mentioned, PNG files are not fully supported. you said you went to a PNG gallery and everything looked fine, and that may be. they are displayed by IE, however, PNG alpha transparency is mishandled. Open photoshop, make an image with a transparent background, throw some stuff on it, save it as a .png. View it on a colored background in firefox, then do the same thing with IE6. you'll see.

w3c standards: in the web design world there are two types of programmers. group A caters to people with IE either because they dont mind the hours of extra code hacks necessary to make their pages display properly, or because their employers/clients require it due to the fact that IE is bundled with windows and Joe B. Average has no clue that there are other browser options in existence. Joe B. Average has zillions of clones, and some of these clones spend money and click ads on the internet, thus making them a necessary although pain-in-the-neck demographic. Group B writes standards-compliant code, which ALWAYS displays perfectly in firefox, mozilla, safari, opera, and so forth, and occasionally hiccups and/or splats in IE, due solely to IE's substandard DHTML rendering engine. For more information on IE's poor rendering engine visit a list apart or any other well-known web design site. Writing web code for IE users is the digital equivalent of being a duct-tape plumber.

For Joe B. Average, IE6 is a fine browser. it makes web pages appear on his monitor, which is all he cares about. For those of us who demand more from the software which we honor with a spot on our dollar-a-gig drives, any other browser made is a better choice, for the reasons listed above and forty-quadrillion others that have been exhaustively discussed on every forum on the web.

It is no secret, nor is it even remotely arguable that web designers as a group unanimously do not like IE. Not just some of us, ALL of us. If you can show me one professional web designer who actually writes code (not dreamweaver web mavens) and prefers IE to any other browser on earth, I will personally eat my hat. It just won't happen, because those in the know see IE for what it is, which is an outdated legacy product which has been force-fed to the masses. Unless MS suddenly decides to follow W3C like the rest of the world, it will remain so.

And for the record, IT professionals don't prefer IE because its so easy and streamlined and simple and efficient, they prefer it because without it and other crappy piles of code lying around on end-user boxes they wouldn't have spiffy moderately-high-paying jobs running around and fixing them when they break.

If everyone at your company used the best piece of software made in each category of software used, you'd be part time at best, and more likely a "consultant" slanging needlepoint pillow covers on ebay to make ends meet. So yeah, praise be to IE for putting food on your table. Id be saying the same things if I were you.
anakinsolois
94% firefox? lol, my mistake, ill edit it now. Read the sentence again it should make more sense now wink.gif

EDIT:

QUOTE
OH, I have NOT isulted anyone, i mearly stated my opinion which i stand by ! Truth hurts i guess.


guess what? if your opinion hurts others its called an insult
GTX5_Crusader
I edited mine too... Anakin's post had me change mine around... lol

And Anakin is right about the opinion/insult.

Just be glad I'm not one that can easily be insulted. Basically, I don't really care.

And I have known an MCSE favor IE... but I can't support right now because I haven't talked to him for a few months now (since I moved).
anakinsolois
QUOTE
(except the pop-up blocking... I'll give a point to Firefox on that one...)
Not anymore gtx, guess what MS put in IE with SP2?

Okay, i dont claim to be a genius in pipeline transfers etc. etc. but i verified it with cold hard fact. On an empty cache, IE took 42 seconds to load the GN main page while firefox took 22. I dont know HOW its done but with empty histories and caches its proof.
GTX5_Crusader
So I guess you cleaned out the cache before using Firefox eh?

Damn you! Now you got me looking up on how that works... lol

Bah... I'm going to bed...
anakinsolois
Tools -> Options -> Privacy -> Cache wink.gif
yaggy
It is true that IE is bundled with Windows, but does that make it better ?

Lets see what else is bundled with windows..

The firewall
movie maker
picture viewer
wordpad
the burning program
windows messenger
media player
paint
system restore
disc cleanup

See a trend here ?

Thats right, they all have much better 3rd party alternatives !!!!!! including IE/OE
GTX5_Crusader
QUOTE (anakinsolois @ Aug 10 2004, 03:48 AM)
Tools -> Options -> Privacy -> Cache wink.gif

No... I meant how Firefox was able to download the same page in about half the time...
anakinsolois
Oh that.... something to do with pipelines or something....
mutinymonger
I might actually get to try the new browsers mentioned a couple posts before but SP2 has caused some issues. Then activating windows again was difficult.
gofikphoenix
What ever happened to the new version of Netscape? Wasn't that suppose to come out about a week ago? Cause i went to there site and nothing had change, i was wondering what @OL's idea of 'revolutionary' is.
mutinymonger
I haven't heard of netscape in a while, I thought it died off... darn!
§abmudaru
i thought netscape had died off too...huh, weird
mystic-shadow
Avant browser all the way!
ujjwald
Now that I started using Opera, thats my favorite.
Troa34
QUOTE (ujjwald @ Aug 19 2004, 09:56 AM)
Now that I started using Opera, thats my favorite.

ahh welcome to the darkside my friend.
TrickFinlay2
price of opera: $39 USD
price of firefox: free
yaggy
price of opera: $39 USD
price of firefox: free
price of IE: Your System, Security, Privacy and Sanity !!!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.