I never said it is impossible. There is a different between impossible and not-going-to-happen. It is possible for me to put an electromagnet up to my computer. Is that going to happen? No way! This "grand master plan" as you say, is stated a little bit. If an asteroid kill the earthm how is the sign of god's final coming with the crimson moon and dying sun? And from the perspective of mars? Is there some new weird translation that says the new heaven and new mars? From your statement: how is the anti-christ supposed to rule the earth if there's nothing there to rule?
Sorry, but my my interpretation of the bible is a literal (not to be mistaked with liberal) view.
How plausible (I never said possible) is it for NASA, or any space place, to (a) go through all the steps to make mars habitable (

bring materials in which we can live there, © test it with soemspace experts, and (d) finally colonize it?
(a) they're trying to do this now. Bringing oxygen to mars. This will presently work, but unless you make the atmosphere somehow capture it, permanent colonization on mars in not very likely. Also making water sources, etc.
(b)Shelter, other common human life applications © Pah! they said they promised to do this in July 2005. Have they? Nope.
Will they? Maybe, not very soon, especially the way their working now. (d) This is probably the longest step. Who really wants to go to mars? Well, true, lot's of people. But I don't want to be dragged in the ship and go to this planet that might not even be habitable, despite NASA (and other stations) claims.
And how many years will it take to do all that? Decades? Yeah, like maybe 11 or twelve...
QUOTE(Invalid_Entry @ Sep 22 2006, 02:30 PM)

OK... completely inappropriate comparison there. The second coming of Jesus, if you believe in it, is something that no man could ever predict, and something with no scientific basis. It is entirely up to God, again assume you believe in alll this. Additionally, according to Revelations the second coming won't happen until the anti-christ rules on Earth (meaning rules THE Earth... global government), and frankly (despite the crappy political events that have happened so far) I just don't think that's occured yet.
Space exploration and technologies therein ARE something with a scientific basis. I was stating that despite previous deadlines set by old government administrations being completely unrealistic (due to unstable funding), this new breed of space explorer (in the private sector) will be much more stable, and much more accurate with their predicted deadlines, because they are using their own money to accomplish all of this. And I don't know about any of you, but most businesses like to see results pretty close to on-time when they're dumping tons of money into a project.
Any man who claims to know when the second coming or the end of days will occur is either a fool or a lier. And to claim that ANYTHING is impossible because of your faith makes you arrogant and foolish as well. For all we know, the end could come as a giant astroid strike, or we could be meant to colonize other worlds because the end of days will come sometime AFTER an asteroid wipes out all life on Earth, and there need to be people still around for it to happen. The point is, we don't know, and we won't until it happens. We can't make ANY assumptions about the "Grand master plan", or we're simply being ignorant.
I base my statement on the fact that a great deal of advancements has occured in the field within the past decade that has not received a whole lot of press-coverage, all of which collectively suggests another exploration boom is coming to a head, this time into space. The rate of advancement, along with new rising business interests, all convincingly suggests that these things will happen within the next few decades (hopefully, if you're healthy, that's within your lifetime).
[Please note: I don't just "say stuff". When I make a statement, I try to back it up with information, so it can be clearly distinguished from "just my opinion". In a debate, this is paramount, as simply saying you disagree is pointless. You have every right to disagree, but please, explain WHY! Who knows, you may be right, and I may learn something new if you actually provide the rest of us with the reasoning behind your thought, but to simply say "No! You're wrong, and that's that" is both frustrating and unproductive.]